Peer Support Among Persons With Severe Mental Illnesses a Review of Evidence and Experience

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to delineate the electric current state-of-the-knowledge of peer support following the framework employed in the 2004 commodity (Solomon, Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2004;27(4):392–401 1). A scoping literature was conducted and included manufactures from 1980 to present. Since 2004, major growth and advancements in peer support have occurred from the development of new specializations to training, certification, reimbursement mechanisms, competency standards and allegiance cess. Peer support is now a service offered beyond the world and considered an indispensable mental health service. Every bit the field continues to evolve and develop, peer support is emerging as a standard of practice throughout various, diverse settings and shows potential to bear upon clinical outcomes for service users throughout the globe. While these efforts take enhanced the professionalism of the peer workforce, hopefully this has enhanced the positive elements of these services and not diluted them.

Introduction

Peer support/peer-supported services can be institute across the world [two–five]. Peer support/peer-supported services include inpatient, outpatient, digital, and community-based services for people with mental health weather and/or substance use challenges by individuals who identify every bit experiencing like lived experiences [1, 6]. More than xxx,000 peer support specialists (also chosen: peer providers, peers, peer specialists, peer supporters, peer mentors, peer navigators, certified peer back up specialists) in the United States offering Medicaid reimbursable services in 43 states [7–ix]. The spread of peer support and its' growth in prove related to the effectiveness for service users [2–four], have led to major advancements. Equally such, an update to the seminal article on peer support by Solomon [1], which was published over 17 years ago, is warranted.

The intent of this article is to delineate the current country-of-the-knowledge of peer support following the framework employed in the 2004 article [1]. Initially, we will ascertain peer back up and the diverse types of peer services and innovations in the current context, followed by advancements in underlying psychosocial processes. Next, the authors nowadays the benefits of peer support services, and lastly, how critical ingredients are assessed today.

Updated Definition of Peer Support

Originally, peer support was defined as social and/or emotional back up that combines expertise from lived experience that is mutually offered and provided by persons with a mental health condition to others sharing similar conditions to bring nigh their self-adamant personal change [1]. Given the broadness of this definition for the most part it still holds. However, there are some nuances that require updating and enhanced recognition.

First, at the time of the original publication, peer support was largely informal such every bit cocky-assistance groups or somewhat semi-structured with a few agencies hiring peers to offer help to other peers, and predominately focused on being mutually supportive. However, today it is more than about supportive service provision based on experiential knowledge delivered to service users by those sharing a mental wellness challenge. Thus, rather than existence mutually offered, where the intent was to do good both parties to some extent, currently the purpose of peer back up services emphasizes assisting those served, with benefit to the deliverer being a secondary gain, as noted by peers workers themselves [ten]. Therefore, the definition needs to be modified from mutually offered and provided to beingness delivered by mutual agreement.

Second, it is frequently virtually delivering a service that tin be paid for through program dollars or reimbursed by governmental insurance, although in some organizations, it also offered on a voluntary footing. Consequently, the service is more structured today, rather than primarily providing informal support, and may involve the delivery of evidence-based interventions, such as self-management programs including Wellness Recovery Action Planning [11], adult by a peer, and Illness Management and Recovery [12], which was developed by professionals and is delivered by both peers and non-peers [13]. Other programs provided have been developed past peers such as emotional CPR [fourteen] or co-produced by peers and not-peer scientists such as PeerTECH [15, 16]. These interventions offer important and practical information and skill teaching while withal providing assistance in accessing needed resources and enhancing companionship past sharing experiences and knowledge.

Third, "mental wellness condition" in the original definition was considered to be a astringent psychiatric disorder [1]. Nonetheless, today "mental wellness challenges" maybe a more appropriate term, as these challenges are far more inclusive of mental health issues such as trauma, extreme stress, feelings of loneliness, as well as the total spectrum of mental health diagnoses.

Fourth, while peer support services remain focused on enhancing and maintaining wellness and recovery of mental health condition, there is recognition of numerous comorbidities of people with mental health challenges, including substance use disorders and chronic medical conditions [17] every bit well as involvement in multiple human being service and governmental systems, such as criminal justice and child welfare. Thus, the concept of lived experience expertise goes across simply mental wellness per se to include living with chronic medical weather and having experienced forensic and child welfare interest and being a parent with a mental disease [eighteen]. This has led to specialized chronic affliction self-management programs delivered by peers, such as Health and Recovery Peer programme (HARP) [19, 20] and peer navigators to heighten health and health care utilization [21], health coaches [22, 23], and employment of forensic peer specialists. In parts of the world that are impoverished and take experienced countrywide trauma such as in Rwanda Africa, peers in not-profits for example, Opromamer offer entrepreneurial peer back up services to enhance economical empowerment of service users of the mental health system.

Lastly, peer support services often support individuals in the community as adjunctive to traditional mental wellness intendance encounters with licensed clinical professionals, comprised of social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists [2, 3]. Peer support continues to be offered equally an independent service by organizations unaffiliated with the traditional mental health system besides. By and large, peer support services are ordinarily delivered in-person, in-group sessions or through "digital peer support," a relatively new category of service delivery that has go particularly prominent globally during the COVID-19 pandemic [iii, 24]. Digital peer back up or digital peer back up specialist is defined as live or automated services delivered through applied science media by peers [three]. These technology media include peer-to-peer networks on social media or online groups such as Peer Support Solutions and ForLikeMinds, and peer-delivered interventions supported with smartphone apps, video games, and virtual reality.

While there has been much growth and enhancements, the core of the service remains unchanged. However, there is a demand for slight modifications to the definition to reflect these important advancements. Thus, the updated definition of peer support is social and/or emotional support that combines expertise from lived feel that is delivered with mutual agreement by persons who cocky-identify equally having or had mental health every bit well as other social, psychological and medical challenges to service users sharing like challenges to bring most cocky-determined personal modify to the service user. Self-identification is important today given designated positions and reimbursement requirements. The definition is non bars to whatever detail mode of service delivery, but leaves the modality unspecified. This definition is consistent with the definition of the role of peer support worker defined by Mead et al. [6] that is used globally as "offering and receiving help, based on shared agreement, respect and common empowerment between people in similar situations".

Defining and Delineating Categories of Peer Support

In the original manuscript, the categories of peer back up were delineated into six categories: cocky-help groups, internet support groups, peer delivered services, peer run or operated services, peer partnerships, and peer employees. Although these categories remain relevant today, it is apparent that in that location is overlap amidst some categories (e.thou., peer delivered and peer employees) and mixes way of commitment with support types (e.yard., net self-help versus self- assist); therefore, this categorization requires refinement. Swarbrick and Schmidt [25] offered a taxonomy that maintains the integrity of this classification with enhanced mutuality of categories: peer-delivered self-help, peer-run services, peer partnerships, and peers in recovery as employees. For purposes of this article, these categories will be utilized. Nevertheless, some of these categories take been greatly expanded in terms of settings, substantive content and mode of delivery, particularly in the utilise of technology, compared to an earlier time. All of which will be elaborated upon below.

Before we delineate and define each of the categories, information technology is important to notation that in this period of consumerism and distrust of professionals, there has been increasing recognition internationally of the value of employing people who share common characteristics such as residence in similar or same neighborhood or community (e.g., community health workers). As with the initial commodity, the focus will exist maintained on mental wellness and and then far equally other domains, they will only be discussed when serving people with dual challenges of, for example, substance utilize and/or chronic wellness conditions and mental wellness challenges or with the need to make distinctions from services with the primary focus of the article. Each category will exist divers and a word volition follow on how these have changed in the past 17 years since publication of the original article [1].

Peer Delivered Cocky-help

Peer delivered self-aid is informally offered on a voluntary basis to another peer to mutually help each other to satisfy a common need/goal to bring almost personal change. Peer self-help is more commonly delivered in a group format, such groups are defined as "voluntary small grouping structures for mutual aid in the accomplishment of a specific purpose…unremarkably formed by peers who have come together for mutual assistance in satisfying a mutual demand, overcoming a common handicap or life-disrupting problem, and bringing about desired social and/or personal change" [26]. This is the fastest growing category of peer back up services in low and middle-income countries. Peer self-help groups for mental health challenges gained increasing prominence in the era of deinstitutionalization, every bit people were frequently discharged into communities with limited community-based mental health services and many had negative experiences with professional mental health services, especially land psychiatric hospitals. Thus, these back up services were more than acceptable, feasible, and attainable to people with mental health challenges. Self-help groups cover just almost every mental wellness-related challenge/condition and co-morbid physical wellness or social health challenge (due east.g., loneliness). The most noted ones relevant to the current topic that offer global cocky-help services, some exist for many years, are Recovery International, Schizophrenics Anonymous, Emotions Anonymous, Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance, and the Hearing Voices Network. Recently, self-help groups take arisen to encounter the growing demand for additional services, including those that focus on mental wellness and physical health challenges and aging with a serious mental illness such as the COAPS Facebook group.

Self-help groups are likewise expanding on digital platforms such every bit formal websites (e.thousand., peersupportsolutions.com and ForLikeMinds), social media (eastward.k., Facebook) [27], Twitter [28], listservs (e.g., Reddit) [29], and Youtube [30]. These self-help groups are not restricted to location, size, or time. Generally, these groups are informal and facilitated by untrained, often voluntary, peers [three], but may be facilitated or co-facilitated by a professional (hybrid self-aid groups) [31]. While the utilise of technology for support groups has been around for nigh twenty years, they are at present much more pervasive and sophisticated than previously. At the time of the original article, the technology that was used was more listservs, bulletin boards or e-mail, and very limited, if at all, plus synchronous communication was merely possible through a telephone. Currently, synchronous communication is readily available via platforms like Zoom, What'south App, or Facetime. Thus, with avant-garde technology, the face-to-face element may exist facilitated inside the digital environs, which was not the case previously.

Peer Run Services

Peer-run services are those that are planned, administered and led by peers [one]. These service programs may exist legally contained entities, simply often these service programs are embedded within a larger non-peer organization. These differ with regard to size and the nature of the services provided and the number of paid and voluntary staff. Yet, all value liberty of choice and maintaining operational control by peers [one], as these service programs emerged equally an alternative to traditional mental health services by consumers who were role of the antipsychiatry movement [32]. Thus, they wanted to maintain independence from the traditional mental wellness organisation. Examples of peer run services include (1) peer respite (i.e., a voluntary, short-term, overnight program that provides customs-based, not-clinical crisis back up to help people outside of a clinical environment) [33], (2)warmlines (i.e., 24/seven non-emergency telephone line that provides accessible emotional support offered voluntarily by peers in recovery to aid other peers to help in preventing a psychiatric crunch from occurring) [34], and (3 drib-in centers such as BRIDGES (i.e., psychosocial educational programs that support self-direction of mental health conditions [35].

Peer-run organizations have expanded to include social entrepreneurial organizations. For example, Dr. Patricia Deegan, an internationally-known disability rights advocate and an private with lived experience of a mental health challenge developed Commonground as a gear up of tools to restructure how individuals with psychiatric disabilities and medication prescribers work together in treatment planning. Individuals with lived experience of a mental health challenge thus created this spider web-based program [36]. The company now offers training and materials/guides/tools for using Personal Medicine in recovery.

Peer Partnership

Peer partnership has remained unchanged. These are organizations where fiduciary responsibility lies with not-peers and administrative and operational responsibilities is mutually shared by both peers and non-peers, but primary control is with peers. These entities are not unlike hybrid self-assistance groups where professional non-peers have a primary role in developing and/or facilitating the groups [1].

Peers in Recovery as Employees

Peers in recovery as employees are individuals who are hired into designated peer positions or traditional mental health positions who must publicly self-identify as a peer and have been or are a service user themselves for their own mental health claiming [1]. This is the fastest growing category of peer support services in the United States, as it is viewed as a means to operationalize recovery-oriented services, which is mandated federally and past nearly states, and an incentive to this service provision is that they can be reimbursed by federal public health insurance. Offset in 2001 with the state of Georgia, United States public wellness insurance, Medicaid, reimburses for peer delivered services meeting certification standards [37, 38]. Twenty years subsequently, 43 states now reimburse for peer support services [viii, 9] and take developed peer back up certification to meet Medicaid standards for qualifications and training. Hence, these peers are often referred to equally certified peer specialists. Requirements range in eligibility criteria (e.g., some states crave a high school diploma, grooming topics and hours, required number of hours of services provision, and preparation in peer back up models to be delivered (e.g., Intentional Peer Support, Recovery International model) [seven]. Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and many European nations have followed suit in employing peers as service providers [39].

Commonly, certified peer support specialists piece of work in conjunction with traditional psychiatric care [40] and increasingly are integrated inside medical and psychiatric handling settings [41]. Guidelines require training for peer support specialists in order to deliver services and to be supervised by a qualified mental health professional, which can be a peer or non-peer [37]. In 2015, the Substance Corruption for Mental Wellness Services (SAMHSA) defined peer support competencies (2015) and delineated core competencies based on the principles of recovery-oriented and person-centered care, being voluntary, human relationship-focused and trauma-informed. Later enhancements build on these competencies and include ones for digital peer support [42].

New endorsements or peer support specializations that build on country peer support training and certifications include training on older developed peer support [43], digital peer back up [44], and forensic peer support [45]. Professional development may include grooming in specific interventions, some empirically-supported, such as Whole Wellness Action Management to improve health for high incidence chronic medical conditions [46], Health Recovery Activeness Planning [xi], trauma-informed peer support for people living with HIV [47], and peer support for mothers with mental health challenges [48].

Furthermore, mental health peer support employees are currently being integrated within full general healthcare [41], such as primary care clinics [49] and behavioral health homes [41]. The likely precipitant for this integration may be due to people with serious mental disease dying up to 32 years earlier than the general population [50], nigh notably from co-morbid mental health and physical health atmospheric condition [17], and the needed interaction for treating both mental health and physical wellness weather in addressing these co-morbidities [51]. Farther, is the increasing evidence of peer support successfully augmenting general healthcare betwixt encounters and impacting chronic disease self-management skill evolution and promoting positive medical outcomes [15, 19, 20, 52].

In emerging cases in depression and center-income countries, peers are delivering mental health care. For case, peer support in Republic of uganda began in 2011 and peers offering peer support services in substitution for food or transportation [53]. These services may include one-on-one peer support or delivery of prescriptions to service users' homes. In India, peer back up specialists (or "peer back up volunteers") offering peer back up via habitation visitation, which is a regime-sponsored service established in 2015 [53]. Increasingly due to the COVID-19 crisis, these services are now offered over the telephone or through smartphone apps such as "What's App" [53].

The commencement digital peer support plan in the scientific literature dates to 2005 in the United States with a spider web-based plan that provided online group therapy and instruction to dyads (i.e., a person with a lived experience of schizophrenia and a support person). Each dyad had a spider web-based message board to informally back up one another [54]. Since 2005, there have been advancements in digital peer back up including smartphone apps, web-based platforms, and social media tools [three]. Soon after 2005, Asia, Europe, and Commonwealth of australia developed digital peer support programs financed through grant-funded positions or commercial wellness insurers [three]. Many peers in the United States own or have a smartphone provided to them by their employer for business concern use [16]. The COVID-19 outbreak and the subsequent National Emergency Declaration [55] allowed for many states with Medicaid reimbursable peer support services to offer Medicaid reimbursable digital peer back up through telehealth. Globally the United Kingdom's response to COVID resulted in a National Emergency Annunciation in Europe [56], followed by the National Emergency Announcement in Canada, both of which immune for many provinces and territories to offer reimbursable digital peer support services issued nether national safety and privacy laws [57].

Every bit is evident, peer support delivered every bit employees has greatly expanded in the United states of america and internationally since the publication of the original article. As noted previously, the pervasiveness of consumerism, increasing distrust of professionals and the growing value placed on lived experience to enhancing access to health care has resulted in the rise of similar positions in the medical care organisation, specifically Community Health Workers (CHW). However, it is important to note that they are non peer back up employees as CHWs lack cocky-identification as having a lived experience of a mental health challenge [58]. Every bit divers in the Affordable Care Human activity, a customs health worker (CHW) is an individual based in the customs who promotes health or nutrition through liaison activities between health care agencies and the community, provides social aid and guidance to community residents, enhances communication betwixt residents and health care providers, offers health and nutritional didactics that is culturally and linguistically appropriate, supports referrals and follow-up services, and proactively identifies and advocates for the enrollment of eligible individuals in covered health service programs [59]. Although CHW share similar positive benefits and outcomes as peer supporters; there are important distinctions between the two positions. A CHW is an individual with piffling to no formal clinical training, but are members of the community in which they work with medical patients who share similar ethnic and racial characteristics by providing support for medical-related issues such as long-term medication management, rides to and from appointments [8]. Different terms are used to describe CHWs, including patient navigators, peer whole health passenger vehicle/wellness coach, and promotors. Unlike peers, they practice not take a mental health challenge or for that affair do non share the mutual lived feel of a medical challenge, but rather share cultural and customs characteristics.

Advancements in the Underlying Psychosocial Processes of Peer Support

In the original article, peer back up was explained past a variety of psychosocial processes/theoretical foundations delineated by Salzer and Shear [x] that underlie peer-delivered services, which included social support [60], experiential cognition [61], helper-therapy principle [62], social learning theory [63], and social comparing theory [64]. While these go on to be relevant, Fortuna et al. [65] expands on this theoretical basis by the improver of self -conclusion theory [66]. Self-conclusion theory proposes that when psychological needs for autonomy/control, self-sufficiency, competence, and connection to others are met, so individuals strive for continuing psychological development in terms of well-being and recovery [66]. As the consumer movement has highlighted the importance of choice in treatment and relationship to others similar themselves, this naturally extends to the service approach of the peer back up workforce. Peers regard autonomy equally a key objective in their work with people with a lived experience of a mental wellness challenge and collaboratively assist in fulfilling their self-adamant goals [65].

In improver, empowerment theory delineates strategies from which peers work with other peers. Empowerment is a process by which people are involved in meaningful sharing of power, which is consistent with shared controlling regarding life problems likewise every bit handling planning [67]. As Deegan [67] eloquently noted information technology is a conventionalities in that all people are capable of interim, and after, changing their state of affairs. Peers help other peers to enhance their power so they are able to obtain essential resources, and reach control over their life to successfully accomplish their ain personal goals. They offer strategies for and information almost accessing needed resource, therefore helping to critically heighten awareness and appraisal of their environment enabling them to more effectively participate in decisions relevant to their own well- beingness [68].

Benefits Derived from Peer Support Services

Benefits/Value of Peer Back up/Peer Provided Services to Individuals Receiving Them

In the original publication, Solomon summarized the outcome research at the fourth dimension, only the service was in its infancy, and consequently, rigorous empirical research was express. Since the original publication in 2004, at that place has been a number of systematic reviews of peer provided services (e.g., [2, 69,70,71,72,73], and specialized ones on digital peer support [three],on one-to-one peer support [4] and another on low-and centre income countries [74]. Reviewers accept had different criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and studies take been diversified with regard to designs (i.e. experimental, quasi- experimental, etc.) and in outcomes and measures. Reviews with more rigorous designs employing meta-analyses have found less impact [75]. All accept establish some positive furnishings, but about reviews have noted small to moderate effects. A consistent challenge has been the lack of methodological rigor in studies (i.due east., lack of randomized designs) [2, 3], which has precluded reviews from establishing peer support services equally achieving an testify-based practice condition.

The positive outcomes identified in the prior article are retained in this commodity. Nonetheless, the all-time approach to delineating the benefits for purposes of this update is to place the outcomes indicated in the SAMHSA pamphlet entitled [76] based on the research, which was included inside many of the contempo systematic reviews. The issuance produced a list of the value of peer support or from peer support specialists service provision. Due to the lack of consequent methodological rigor, nosotros highlight these outcomes as promising to the field. These outcomes included increased self-esteem and efficacy, sense of command, empowerment, hope, belief in bringing well-nigh change in their lives, sense of belonging, social back up, engagement in self- management, services, handling and customs; and improved social functioning, quality of life and life satisfaction. Further, peer back up likewise resulted in decreases in hospitalizations, self-stigma, psychotic symptoms, depression, substance use and fewer feelings of social isolation. Most relevant research usually determined some positive results, although they may not have constitute support for all outcomes hypothesized. Conspicuously, not all who engage in peer support services will receive all of these benefits, each has a hazard for some do good from receipt of peer support services, although there was a lack of consistency across study outcomes.

Benefits to Peer Employees

Benefits to peer employees take remained unchanged from those specified in the original article. Solomon [one] identified a reduction in hospitalization, enhanced personal growth, which included "increased confidence in their own capabilities, ability to cope with the illness, self-esteem, and sense of empowerment and hope" (p. 396). Farther, being a peer employee helps to challenge self-stigma, to appoint in one'southward ain recovery and cocky-discovery, to heighten their social support network, observe positive ways to spend their time, and gainful employment therefore, achieving a improve quality of life. Moreover, they are offered opportunities for professional growth in terms of learning positive work habits and chore skills, likewise as having the potential for developing and achieving career goals. While these benefits have remained unchanged from those designated in the original publication, they have been greatly enhanced given the extensive expansion of this workforce.

Benefits to the Mental Health Service Delivery System

A chief do good noted in the prior article was the potential cost saving to the mental health service delivery system [1]. These savings are likely accrued through fewer hospitalizations or days of hospitalization, which are past far the well-nigh costly treatment. Potentially, reduced fiscal costs to systems can emanate from participating in cocky-help and peer run programs and receipt of peer employee service provision—not the traditional mental health system. Furthermore, the pedagogy of medical, psychiatric, and social health cocky-management may impact inappropriate service use from the organisation. All the same, as was cautioned in the original article, these savings should not result from paying peer employees less for having the same chore tasks and responsibilities as non-peers.

Some other positive outcome to the organisation is the modification of detrimental attitudes of non-peer employees by their having direct contact with individuals with mental health challenges who are successfully functioning in positive social roles rather than at their worst when in need of services. These mental attitude changes aid to combat societal stigma of persons with mental health atmospheric condition.

Peer support services are possibly more than likely to exist used by those who eschew the traditional mental health services, such as those who are homeless, who take had negative interactions with the system, or for other reasons feel alienated from and mistrustful of professional services. Peer supporters help to engage or re-appoint these individuals into the professional treatment system, are more than inclined to do outreach to those in need and to make referrals to cocky-assist groups. The addition of peers to existing mental health services enhances the value and benefits of these services [1].

Benefits to Society

The employment of peers to complement traditional mental health services in areas where the services and professionals are limited such as rural areas, low income communities and countries with scarce resources is clearly an added value. This societal need is a do good that has profoundly expanded in recent years in serving under resourced and underserved areas nationally and internationally, as indicated previously past engaging in job-shifting activities.

Peers every bit employees offer positive part models of people with mental health weather. This and so helps to alleviate societal stigma and bigotry against individuals with mental health issues and seeing them in a more than positive calorie-free. Further, they are able to contribute to guild by being productive citizens and paying taxes and therefore reduce regime expenditures and resources.

Critical Ingredients of Peer Support Services

At the fourth dimension of the writing of original publication, there were no standards for peer employees, consequently the critical ingredients were determined by Solomon based on the limited available inquiry. These ingredients were delineated into three categories: service elements, characteristics of peer providers, and characteristics of mental health service delivery system, which were supported past the available bear witness at the time. Although these elements remain relevant, there are now guidance and standards for peer employees that are upwardly to date in their conceptualization and more appropriate equally standards. SAMHSA issued competences for peer workers in behavioral health services in 2015 and in 2016 Chinman et al. engaged in preliminary efforts for the evolution of a fidelity measure for peers. These will both exist discussed below. It is as well of import to note that the proliferation of peers and their expansion in the by two decades such that now even accrediting bodies such as the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) has developed standards to include peer support specialists in the workforce [77]. For example, man resource policies and practices within an organisation need to promote integration of the peer workforce in the following areas, including responsive hiring practices, acceptance of lived feel expertise in place of formal credentials, and chore structures offering opportunities for advancement.

Core Competencies for Peers in Behavioral Health Services

Cadre competencies were developed with the input of a diversity of experts in the content area. Cadre competencies are the ability to carry out a specific function or function. The competencies are described as the integration of the three dimensions of cognition skills and attitudes that are necessary prerequisites to performing a designated office or job. Cadre competencies offer guidance for training, certification and job descriptions [78]. Based on SAMHSA efforts five foundational principles of the core competencies for peer workers were identified: recovery oriented, person-centered, voluntary, relationship focused and trauma informed. These essential competencies were delineated into fourteen categories (see Table ane with listing of categories).

Table 1 Core Competencies for Peers

Total size tabular array

The document acknowledges that these are foundational competencies that require continual updating and may necessitate specialized competencies for specific populations such as homeless or particular contexts such equally correctional institutions.

Intervention Allegiance

Without a fidelity to the critical components of peer support, the quality of peer support or its touch tin can be examined. To appointment, it is not known, which peer support models produce which outcomes. A contempo narrative review establish none of the scientific evidence on peer support considers which model of peer support is being employed. Chinman et al. [75] adult a nineteen service detail fidelity measure (see Tabular array 2 for listing of service activities).

Table 2 Peers Service Activity Domains

Full size table

These investigators found that their terminal ready of service domains matched well with a chore depiction report of peer workers, which provides further support at defining the activities engaged in past peer workers. Nevertheless they practice bespeak that the results are preliminary and require farther research. Also, there may be other activities engaged in by working with a specialized population or in a particular service environment such equally correctional facilities. Futurity psychometric testing can examine the utility of this tool to measure fidelity.

Conclusion

Since 2004, advancements in peer support range from the evolution of new specializations (i.e., older adult, forensic, digital) to preparation, certification, country-wide reimbursement, competencies, and a fidelity assessment. Peer support is a service at present provided beyond the globe and considered an essential service [5]. As peer support continues to evolve, information technology is emerging as a standard of recovery in multiple settings and empirical evidence demonstrates bear upon on recovery and clinical outcomes.

References

1. Solomon P. Peer support/peer provided services underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2004;27(four):392–401. https://doi.org/x.2975/27.2004.392.401.

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

2. Chinman M, George P, Dougherty RH, Daniels Every bit, Ghose SS, Swift A, Delphin-Rittmon ME. Peer support services for individuals with serious mental illnesses: Assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(iv):429–41. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300244.

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

3. Fortuna KL, DiMilia PR, Lohman MC, Cotton BP, Cummings JR, Bartels SJ, Batsis JA, Pratt SI. Systematic review of the impact of behavioral health homes on cardiometabolic chance factors for adults with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv (Washington, D.C.). 2020;71(1):57–74. https://doi.org/x.1176/appi.ps.201800563.

4. White S, Foster R, Marks J, Morshead R, Goldsmith L, Barlow S, Gillard S. The effectiveness of 1-to-one peer back up in mental wellness services: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;xx(1). https://doi.org/x.1186/s12888-020-02923-3.

5. World Health Organization. Promoting recovery in mental health and related services. World Health Organization. 2017.

6. Mead S, Hilton D, Curtis L. Peer support: A theoretical perspective. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001;25(2):134–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0095032.

   CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

7. Cronise R, Teixeira C, Rogers ES, Harrington S. The peer support workforce: Results of a national survey. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2016;39(3):211–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000222.

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

8. Daniels AS, Bergeson Southward, Myrick KJ. Defining peer roles and status amid community health workers and peer support specialists in integrated systems of care. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(12):1296–eight. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201600378.

   Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

9. Kaufman BG, Reiter KL, Pink GH, Holmes GM. Medicaid expansion affects rural and urban hospitals differently. Health Aff. 2016;35(9):1665–72. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0357.

   Article  Google Scholar

10. Salzer MS, Shear SL. Identifying consumer-provider benefits in evaluations of consumer-delivered services. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2002;25(3):281–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0095014.

    Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

11. Cook JA, Copeland ME, Floyd CB, Jonikas JA, Hamilton MM, Razzano Fifty, Boyd S. A randomized controlled trial of furnishings of Wellness Recovery Activeness Planning on depression, anxiety, and recovery. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(6):541–7. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201100125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

12. Mueser KT, Meyer PS, Penn DL, Clancy R, Clancy DM, Salyers MP. The Illness Direction and Recovery program: Rationale, development, and preliminary findings. Schizophr Bull. 2006;32(Suppl i):S32–S43. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbl022.

13. Petros R, Solomon P. How adults with serious mental illness learn and use health recovery action plan'due south recovery framework. Qual Health Res. 2020;31(four):631–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320975729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

14. Myers AL, Collins-Pisano C, Ferron JC, Fortuna KL. Feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a peer-adult and delivered program: Emotional CPR. J Participat Med. 20214;13(1):e25867. https://doi.org/10.2196/25867.

15. Fortuna KL, Storm M, Naslund JA, Chow P, Aschbrenner KA, Lohman MC, DiMilia P, Bartels SJ. Certified peer specialists and older adults with serious mental illness' perspectives of the bear on of a peer-delivered and technology-supported self-direction intervention. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2018;206(eleven):875–81. https://doi.org/ten.1097/NMD.0000000000000896.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

16. Fortuna KL, Aschbrenner KA, Lohman MC, Brooks J, Salzer Chiliad, Walker R, St George 50, Bartels SJ. Smartphone ownership, utilize, and willingness to use smartphones to provide peer-delivered services: Results from a national online survey. Psychiatry Q. 2018;89(iv):947–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-018-9592-5.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

17. De Hert Chiliad, Cohen D, Bobes J, Cetkovich-Bakmas M, Leucht South, Ndetei DM, Newcomer JW, Uwakwe R, Asai I, Möller HJ, Gautam S, Detraux J, Correll CU. Concrete illness in patients with severe mental disorders. Ii. Barriers to care, monitoring and treatment guidelines, plus recommendations at the organization and individual level. Earth Psychiatr Official J World Psychiatr Assoc (WPA). 2011;10(2):138–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00036.x. PMID: 21633691. PMCID: PMC3104888.

18. Nicholson J, de Girolamo Thousand, Schrank B. Editorial: Parents with mental and/or substance use disorders and their children. Forepart Psych. 2019;10:915. https://doi.org/x.3389/fpsyt.2019.00915.

    Article  Google Scholar

19. Druss BG, Singh M, von Esenwein SA, Glick GE, Tapscott South, Tucker SJ, Sterling EW. Peer-led self-management of general medical conditions for patients with serious mental illnesses: A randomized trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(5):529–35. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201700352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

20. Druss BG, Zhao Fifty, Esenwein SAV, Bona JR, Fricks Fifty, Jenkins-Tucker S, Lorig M. The Health and Recovery Peer (HARP) Program: A peer-led intervention to improve medical self-management for persons with serious mental illness. Schizophr Res. 2010;118(i–3):264–lxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2010.01.026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

21. Kelly Eastward, Fulginiti A, Pahwa R, Tallen 50, Duan L, Brekke JS. A airplane pilot test of a peer navigator intervention for improving the wellness of individuals with serious mental illness. Community Ment Health J. 2014;l(four):435–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-013-9616-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

22. Gao North, Solomon P, Dirt Z, Swarbrick P. A pilot study of health coaching for smoking abeyance among individuals with mental illness. J Ment Health. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2021.1922630.

23. Swarbrick One thousand, Gill KJ, Prat CW. Touch of peer delivered health coaching. Psychiatr Rehab J, 2016;39(three):234–eight. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000187. Epub seven Apr 2016. PMID: 27054901.

24. Wolf J. Mental health peer support workforce designline mental wellness peer support workforce designline. Peer Support. 2020. https://www.hca.wa.gov/avails/program/mental-health-peer-support-workforce-designline.pdf.

25. Swarbrick One thousand, Schmidt L. People in recovery as providers of psychiatric rehabilitation: Building on the wisdom of experience. US Psychiatr Rehab Assoc. 2010.

26. Katz AH, Bender EI. Self-help groups in Western club: History and prospects. J Appl Behav Sci. 1976;12(3):265–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637601200302.

    Article  Google Scholar

27. Naslund JA, Aschbrenner KA, Marsch LA, Bartels SJ. Feasibility and acceptability of facebook for health promotion among people with serious mental illness. Digital Health. 2016;two:205520761665482. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616654822.

    Article  Google Scholar

28. Berry Due north, Lobban F, Belousov M, Emsley R, Nenadic Yard, Bucci S. #WhyWeTweetMH: Agreement why people use twitter to discuss mental health bug. J Med Cyberspace Res. 2017;19(4): e107. https://doi.org/x.2196/jmir.6173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Primal  Google Scholar

29. Sowles SJ, Krauss MJ, Gebremedhn L, Cavazos-Rehg PA. I feel like I've hit the bottom and take no idea what to do: Supportive social networking on Reddit for individuals with a desire to quit cannabis use. Substance Abuse. 2017;38(4):477–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2017.1354956.

    Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

30. Naslund JA, Grande SW, Aschbrenner KA, Elwyn G. Naturally occurring peer back up through social media: the experiences of individuals with severe mental affliction using YouTube. PLoS One. 2014;9(ten): e110171. https://doi.org/ten.1371/periodical.pone.0110171.

    CAS  Commodity  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

31. Muralidharan A, Peeples Advertizement, Hack SM, Fortuna KL, Klingaman EA, Stahl NF, Phalen P, Lucksted A, Goldberg RW. Peer and non-peer co-facilitation of a health and wellness intervention for adults with serious mental Illness. Psychiatry Q. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09818-2.

    Article  Google Scholar

32. Chamberlin J. The ex-patients' movement: Where we've been and where we're going. J Heed Behav. 1990;11(three/iv):323–36.

33. Ostrow L, Croft B. Peer respites: A enquiry and practice agenda. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(half-dozen):638–twoscore. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400422.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Primal  Google Scholar

34. Pudlinski C. Reverse themes on three peer-run warm lines. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001;24(4):397–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0095065.

    CAS  Commodity  PubMed  Google Scholar

35. Petros R, Solomon P. Reviewing illness self-direction programs: A choice guide for consumers, practitioners, and administrators. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(xi):1180–1193.

36. Deegan PE. A Web awarding to support recovery and shared decision making in psychiatric medication clinics. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010;34(1):23–8. https://doi.org/10.2975/34.1.2010.23.28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

37. Department of Health and Human Services. CMS, SMDL 07–011. COVID-19 emergency declaration. 2007.

38. Salzer MS, Schwenk E, Brusilovskiy Eastward. Certified peer specialist roles and activities: results from a national survey. Psychiatr Serv (Washington, DC). 2010;61(v):520–3. https://doi.org/ten.1176/ps.2010.61.5.520.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

39. Davies Thou, Grayness M, Butcher L. Lean on me: the potential for peer support in a non-government Australian mental health service. Asia Pac J Soc Work Dev. 2014;24(ane–2):109–21. https://doi.org/x.1080/02185385.2014.885213.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

40. Shalaby R, Agyapong V. Peer support in mental wellness: Literature review. JMIR Ment Wellness. 2020;7(6): e15572. https://doi.org/10.2196/15572.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Fundamental  Google Scholar

41. Fortuna KL, Myers AL, Walsh D, Walker R, Mois G, Brooks JM. Strategies to increment peer back up specialists' chapters to apply digital technology in the era of COVID-19: Pre-post study. JMIR Ment Wellness 2020;vii(7). https://doi.org/ten.2196/20429.

42. Collins-Pisano C, Court JV, Johnson M, Mois 1000, Brooks J, Myers A, Muralidharan A, Storm M, Wright M, Berger N, Kasper A, Flim-flam A, MacDonald Southward, Schultze, Fortuna Chiliad. Introduction to the co-product of core competencies for digital peer support: Efforts to promote consistency and standardization of best practices. Under review. Core Competencies to Promote Consistency and Standardization of Best Practices for Digital Peer Back up: Focus Group Study. 2021 Dec xvi;8(12):e30221. https://doi.org/10.2196/30221.

43. Mbao M, Collins-Pisano C, Fortuna K. Older adult peer back up specialists' age-related contributions to an integrated medical and psychiatric self-management intervention: Qualitative written report of text message exchanges. JMIR Course Res. 2021;five(3): e22950. https://doi.org/10.2196/22950.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

44. Fortuna KL, Naslund JA, LaCroix JM, Bianco CL, Brooks JM, Zisman-Ilani Y, Muralidharan A, Deegan P. Digital peer support mental wellness interventions for people with a lived experience of a serious mental disease: Systematic review. JMIR Mental Health. 2020;vii(iv): e16460. https://doi.org/10.2196/16460.

    Commodity  PubMed  PubMed Primal  Google Scholar

45. Adams WE, Lincoln AK. Forensic peer specialists: Training, employment, and lived experience. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2020;43(3):189–96. https://doi.org/x.1037/prj0000392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

46. Whole Health Activity Management (WHAM). Peer support training participant guide, published by the SAMHSAHRSA center for integrated health solutions (www.integration.samhsa.gov). 2012.

47. Peterson JL, Rintamaki LS, Brashers DE, Goldsmith DJ, Neidig JL. The forms and functions of peer social support for people living with HIV. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Intendance. 2012;23(4):294–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2011.08.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

48. Nicolson J, Valentine A. Central informants specify core elements of peer supports for parents with serious mental illness. Front Psych. 2019 Mar 4. https://doi.org/x.3389/fpsyt.2019.00106.

49. Shepardson RL, Johnson EM, Possemato K, Arigo D, Funderburk JS. Perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation of peer back up in Veterans Health Assistants principal care-mental health integration settings. Psychol Serv. 2019;xvi(three):433–44. https://doi.org/x.1037/ser0000242.

    Article  Google Scholar

50. Walker ER, McGee RE, Druss BG. Mortality in mental disorders and global disease burden implications. JAMA Psychiatr. 2015;72(4):334. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2502.

    Article  Google Scholar

51. Rodgers Thousand, Dalton J, Harden M, Street A, Parker G, Eastwood A. Integrated intendance to accost the physical health needs of people with severe mental affliction: A mapping review of the contempo evidence on barriers, facilitators and evaluations. Int J Integr Care. 2018;xviii(one):9. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2605.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

52. O'Hara K, Stefancic A, Cabassa LJ. Developing a peer-based salubrious lifestyle program for people with serious mental illness in supportive housing. Transl Behav Med. 2017;vii(four):793–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-016-0457-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

53. Mpango R, Kalha J, Shamba D, Ramesh Thousand, Ngakongwa F, Kulkarni A, Korde P, Nakku J, Ryan GK. Challenges to peer support in low- and middle-income countries during COVID-xix. Glob Health. 2020;sixteen(1):xc. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00622-y.

    Article  Google Scholar

54. Rotondi AJ, Haas GL, Anderson CM, Newhill CE, Spring MB, Ganguli R, Rosenstock JB. A clinical trial to examination the feasibility of a telehealth psychoeducational intervention for persons with schizophrenia and their families: Intervention and 3-Month findings. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;fifty(four):325–36. https://doi.org/x.1037/0090-5550.50.4.325.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

55. Wu AW, Connors C, Everly GS Jr. COVID-nineteen: Peer support and crunch communication strategies to promote institutional resilience. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(12):822–three. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-1236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

56. Pierce 1000, Promise H, Ford T, Hatch S, Hotopf M, John A, Abel KM. Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the U.k. population. Lancet Psychiatr. 2020. https://doi.org/x.1016/s2215-0366(20)30308-4.

    Commodity  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

57. Johnston A. Prevention is better than the cure: Getting privacy compliance right is essential exercise direction. Aust J Gen Pract. 2019;48(i–2):17–21. https://doi.org/x.31128/AJGP-09-eighteen-4702.

58. Myrick K, del Vecchio P. Peer support services in the behavioral healthcare workforce: Land of the field. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2016;39(3):197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar

59. Shah Yard, Heisler Grand, Davis M. Community health workers and the patient protection and affordable care human activity: An opportunity for a research, advancement, and policy agenda. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2014;25(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2014.0019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

60. Sarason IG, Levine HM, Basham RB et al. Assessing social back up: The Social Support Questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44:127–39.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

61. Borkman T. (1999). Understanding self-help/mutual aid: experiential learning in the eatables. Rutgers University Press.

62. Skovholt TM. The client every bit helper: A means to promote psychological growth. Couns Psychol. 1974;4(three):58–64. https://doi.org/ten.1177/001100007400400308.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

63. Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior. New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Printing, 1998). 1994;4:71–81. https://doi.org/x.1037/prj0000392.

64. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat. 1954;7(2):117–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202.

    Commodity  Google Scholar

65. Fortuna KL, Brooks JM, Umucu Eastward, Walker R, Chow PI. Peer back up: A human factor to enhance appointment in digital health behavior modify interventions. J Technol Behav MSci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-019-00105-ten.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Primal  Google Scholar

66. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and cocky-determination in homo behavior. New York, NY: Plenum. 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar

67. Deegan P. Recovery and empowerment for people with psychiatric disabilities. Soc Work Health Intendance. 2006;25(iii):xi–24.

    Article  Google Scholar

68. Linhorst D. Empowering people with severe mental affliction: A applied guide. New York: Oxford University Press. 2006.

    Google Scholar

69. Davidson 50, Bellamy C, Guy K, Miller R. Peer support among persons with severe mental illnesses: a review of evidence and experience. World Psychiatr. 2012;eleven(2):123–eight. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Key  Google Scholar

70. Fuhr D, Salisbury TT, DeSilva M, Auf N, Van Gmneken N, Rahman A, Patel V. Effectiveness of peer-delivered interventions for severe mental illness and low on clinical and psychosocial outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014;49:1691–702.

    Article  Google Scholar

71. Lloyd-Evans B, Mayo-Wilson Due east, Harrison B, Istead H, Brown E, Pilling S, Kendall, T. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental disease. BMC Psychiatr. 2014;14:39.

    Article  Google Scholar

72. Repper J, Carter T. A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. J Ment Health. 2011;xx:382–411.

    Article  Google Scholar

73. Rogers Due east, Farkas M, Anthony W, Kash M, Maro, M. Systematic review of peer delivered services literature 1989–2009. Boston, MA Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University. 2009.

74. Vally Z, Abrahams Fifty. The effectiveness of peer-delivered services in the management of mental health weather condition: A meta-analysis of studies from low and heart-income countries. Int J Adv Couns. 2016;38:330–44.

    Article  Google Scholar

75. Chinman M, McCarthy S, Mitchell-Miland C, Daniels K, Youk A, Edelen M. Early on stages of development of a peer specialist fidelity measure. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2016;39(3):256–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

76. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Value of peers. 2017. Bachelor: at: https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/programs_campaigns/brss_tacs/value-of-peers-2017.pdf.

77. CARF International. Peer Support. 2014. Available at: http://bookstore.carf.org/product/INT-3520.eighteen-25.html.

78. SAMHSA. Core Competencies for Peer Workers in Behavioral Health Services. 2015. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/programs_campaigns/brss_tacs/core-competencies_508_12_13_18.pdf

Download references

Funding

Inquiry was supported in part past National Institutes of Mental Wellness Award K01MH117496 to the kickoff author.

Author information

Affiliations

1. Geisel Schoolhouse of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth College, Concord, NH, 03301, U.s.

   Karen L. Fortuna

2. School of Social Policy & Practice, Academy of Pennsylvania, 3701 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

   Phyllis Solomon

3. School of Social Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Newton, MA, 02467, U.s.a.

   Jennifer Rivera

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen L. Fortuna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors accept no conflicts of interest to disembalm.

Additional information

Publisher'southward Annotation

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Virtually this article

Cite this article

Fortuna, K.50., Solomon, P. & Rivera, J. An Update of Peer Back up/Peer Provided Services Underlying Processes, Benefits, and Disquisitional Ingredients. Psychiatr Q (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-022-09971-w

Download commendation

• Accepted: 14 January 2022

• Published: eighteen Feb 2022

• DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-022-09971-w

Keywords

• Peer support
• Mental health
• Lay interventionist

ashworthprios1985.blogspot.com

Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11126-022-09971-w

Share this post